"I say SNAP and they say
something stupid...uh, excuse me, ill informed."
SNAP is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program commonly referred to as food stamps. Stamps are no longer used but
the stigma persists even though the government switched to a plastic card
similar to a credit card. Consequently, the phrase “food stamps” lives on like
most of the misconceptions associated with helping the poor feed themselves and
their children.
In many, many conversations I have had about the food bank,
people often mention early on in our chat that most recipients take advantage
of the system. That is code for race. I immediately say, “Did you know that in Ohio , 49% of SNAP
participants are white? In fact, you can almost assume that whichever majority
is dominant in a particular locality— white, black, Hispanic, etc.—that
majority will have the most SNAP recipients.”
If our SNAP conversation doesn’t die there, we often
move on to how wasteful government is and the food stamp program is probably
one of the worst. Well, maybe twenty years ago that may have been an issue, but
today effective and efficient are more accurate words to describe the SNAP
program.
The final phase of our conversation usually ends up on
unemployment. Another code for lazy.
In DC there is an independent research/lobbying organization
called The
Center for Budget and Policy Priorities that “works to influence federal
and state policies and budget decisions that have a direct effect upon the
lives of millions of low-income Americans.” (As an aside, this group is
responsible for the two graphs above.)
The Center writes on its website that “Most SNAP
recipients who can work do so. Among SNAP households with at least one
working-age, non-disabled adult, more than half work while receiving SNAP—and
more than 80 percent work in the year prior to or the year after receiving
SNAP. The rates are even higher for families with children.”
The most surprising fact they state is “Almost 70 percent of
SNAP recipients are not expected to work, primarily because they are
children, elderly or disabled.” And if you remember my blog from two weeks ago
the new face of SNAP recipients is working-age Americans. So work is not
an issue either no matter what people assume.
While pondering how to disseminate this SNAP information
beyond a one on one discussion, I found another article that helped me
understand more clearly what is going on. The
Politics and Demographics of Food Stamp Recipients by Rich Morin
at Fact
Talk was published, interestingly enough, on July 12, 2013 just one day
after the Paul Krugman piece. Mr. Morin discussed a Pew Research survey that found “significant
proportions of Democrats (60%) and Republicans (52%) say they have benefited
from a major entitlement program at some point in their lives. So have nearly
equal shares of self-identifying conservatives (57%), liberals (53%) and
moderates (53%). The programs were Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid,
welfare, unemployment benefits and food stamps.”
If more than half the country participates in social
programs of one kind or another and we still have misunderstanding and
prejudice, then hypocrisy is at the root of this evil. So how does one beat
hypocrisy? Tell folks, one on one that they are wrong … just as I have been
doing all along.
Miles pothole fix in
the works – In mid December I submitted 30 or so Miles potholes to the
TDOT. Sometime later an article in the Arizona
Daily Star stated the fix might take 40 days. I waited that many days and sent
another email. The reply said I should be patient. Then a few days ago the Arizona Daily Star ran an update saying
the pothole fix is currently down to 14 days but my request was up to 58 days
by now.
The email I sent today was addressed to the newspaper reporter
who wrote the 14-day article suggesting she talk to some pothole weary citizens
instead of the folks who claim they are doing a better job.
I don’t relish confrontations but I dislike people taking
advantage of others more.
We collected a total of 160
lbs. of food. The money we donated amounted
to $32.00, a $25.00 check and $7.00 in cash.
See you Sunday,
Peter
No comments:
Post a Comment